A compelling op-ed by Eliot Spitzer, Frank Partnoy, and William Black appeared in today's NYTimes.
"By [making emails and models related to AIG's counterparties publicly available] online, the government could establish a new form of “open source” investigation."
One argument is that the US is an 80% shareholder -- we should have the shareholder power to compel AIG to make decisions such as this.
An argument against this which I didn't see in the article: perhaps making such emails public, we would hurt AIG, and ultimately ourselves, since it might still be teetering on the edge of collapse. In this case we might be keeping our holding in AIG shares afloat by keeping this information private. But, on the other hand, we also might be missing out on opportunities to claw-back undeserved bonuses or payouts to AIG counterparties.
No comments:
Post a Comment